Hitchhikers Guide To Real Communication.

Forefront: Travel to[ http://nickmielnicki.blogspot.com/2017/05/inside-outside-real-out-of-sanity.html ]for a back-note on these topics.. Thank you
 'When we talk of 'being' we do not mean the Outside. We mean the Inside.'

This example illustrates a standard procedure for appearing to take the Outside into consideration without actually doing so. The rules for this kind of writing are very simple and roughly as follows.
There are a number of words and phrases which may mean something about existence or something about humans.
For example: 'existence', 'depth', 'ground of being', 'ultimate concern', 'meaning', etc. Whenever what you really mean is 'human relationships' or 'day-to-day living' you should replace it by some existential-sounding combination, such as 'the depth of being'. It is a good idea to use compound phrases ('the depth of historical existence', 'the ultimate ground of meaning') as a considerable degree of obscurity can be created by summating the uncertainty of a number of uncertain terms.
It is usual to define these terms as little as possible. But if you wish to appear to do so, it is best to use a series of phrases in apposition (as in the example just considered: 'the whole of human reality, the structure, the meaning and the aim of existence'). This gives a very good effect of struggling to define something difficult with precision while actually generating ambiguity (on the principle of summation of uncertainty already mentioned). The device of apposition itself introduces an additional modicum of doubt, since if you appose two such phrases as 'the depth of meaning' and 'the inmost structure of reality' no one will be sure whether the two phrases are ways of saying the same thing, or whether they are intended to complement one another.
Other verbal devices may be used for placing together in the closest possible proximity 'human' words and 'Outside' words. Words like 'ultimate' and 'reality' should be used in phrases like 'human reality' and 'ultimate concern', and the word 'meaning' should be softened into 'meaning and coherence'. (The word 'meaning' might be regarded as informationally sufficient; however, the addition of 'coherence' contributes a useful implicit suggestion that 'meaning' must hang together in a way that is recognizable and rather agreeable to humans.)
To illustrate these instructions, consider the typical phrase 'life and existence'. Now the word 'existence' may mean 'human life', but if it does it is adding nothing to the meaning of the phrase. So this phrase would seem to mean 'human living and the fact that things are there' -- which seems a strange combination to discuss in the same breath.
Another example of the way in which abstract words such as 'transcendent', 'meaning', 'existence' should be combined with human words such as 'life' and 'confidence':

"High religions are ... distinguished by the extent of the unity and coherence of life which they seek to encompass and the sense of a transcendent source of meaning by which alone confidence in the meaningfulness of life and existence can be maintained."

May I suggest a paraphrase, which I think does not reduce the informational content. 'High religions are distinguished by making the whole of human life feel meaningful to the human being.' As human life already feels meaningful to sane human beings, this would appear to let anything or nothing qualify as a 'high religion'.
It is true that my paraphrase reduces Niebuhr's meaning if he is using the word 'transcendent' in a transcendent sense. If so, what he is saying becomes more complex, but questionable. Assuming 'transcendent' to mean 'possessing a validity which cannot be affected by any consideration whatever', or perhaps 'directly related to the reason for existence', it is difficult to see why a 'transcendent source of meaning' should be expected to maintain anyone's 'confidence in the meaningfulness of life'. For this to be true, we should have to accept the psychological supposition that people can only confidently accept transcendent meanings as meaningful. What is more, we should also have to accept that a transcendent source of meaning would have the characteristic of making a human being confident about the meaning of his life. It is an interesting sidelight on human psychology that it should be so often assumed that a transcendent purpose must be one that 'gives a meaning to life'. In fact, anyone sufficiently unusual to think occasionally about transcendence finds that it makes his life feel intolerably meaningless. (This is why people do not go on doing it.)
If we assume that Niebuhr is using the word 'transcendent' in one of the senses defined above, the most obvious characteristic of a transcendent meaning would seem to be that it invalidates all subordinate meanings. This, after all, is what 'transcendent' means -- that which invalidates, but cannot itself be invalidated. So if Niebuhr is really using the word 'transcendent' to mean that which transcends, what he is saying becomes: 'High religions are distinguished by making the whole of life meaningful by reference to something which makes the whole of life meaningless, which is the only way in which it is possible to maintain confidence that life is meaningful.'
As this is patently absurd, I assume that he is not in fact using the word 'transcendent' in a transcendent sense. It is much more likely that when he talks of a 'transcendent source of meaning' he means 'anything which is capable of making the whole of human life seem meaningful to a large number of people'.
I leave the reader to appreciate the following without further explanation:

God made the world, and is never absent from it. So, within the mind of modern secularism there are feelings after the meaningfulness of human existence, recognition of supreme obligations in human relations, gropings after an undefined 'otherness'.

The name of this infinite and inexhaustible ground of history is God. That is what the word means, and it is that to which the words Kingdom of God and Divine Providence point. And if these words do not have much meaning for you, translate them, and speak of the depth of history, of the ground and aim of our social life, and of what you take seriously without reservation in your moral and political activities. Perhaps you should call this depth hope, simply hope.

Inside, Outside. Real, Out of sanity

Outsidity/ Outside – The space of mind beyond real. Not including truth.  That part of reality which is not emotionally regarded as 'real' by the sane person.
--------------------------------------------

In religious and philosophical writings it is often difficult to eliminate all reference to the Outside. There are a number of ways of dealing with this problem. One of the most successful is to generate a distinctive kind of ambiguity about the meanings of crucial words.

Being -  the whole of human reality, the structure, the meaning and the aim of existence.

'The term 'being' in this context does not designate existence in time and space

When I use the word 'existence' I mean by it what I also mean when I use the word being. It seems that what is ment by this is… 'being there'.

Lets define the word ‘being’ in a second sense. The term 'being' means the whole of human reality some say. The meaning of this phrase is not obvious.

Perhaps we mean the sum total of the mental content of all humans - illusions and all? What humans think is real? Or that part of reality which is accessible to the human mind?


The last seems to be the best we can do. So let us suppose that 'human reality' does mean that part of the mental content -- actual or potential -- of humans which is actually in accordance with what exists.
'Human reality' is then placed in apposition with 'the structure, the meaning and the aim of existence'. What is to be understood by this? The 'aim of existence' seems at first sight to be clear, unless 'existence' has made an unannounced change of meaning since it was first used. It would seem that this phrase must mean 'the purpose for which everything exists'.


But this is difficult, because 'the aim of existence' is in apposition with 'human reality' which certainly does not include the purpose of existence.


This leads us to a distinct suspicion that when some talk of 'the structure, meaning and aim of existence' we do not mean 'existence' at all, but 'human life' instead. If we do mean this, there seems no reason why we should say so -- except that it would rob what we are saying of a status it does not possess. And if we do mean this, we have arrived at the following definition of the word 'being' -- 'whatever happens to be realistic in the mental content of humans; the structure, the meaning and the aim of human life'.


In fact, we may suggest this paraphrase of what some are saying: 'When we talk of 'being' we do not mean the Outside. We mean the Inside.'


This example illustrates a standard procedure for appearing to take the Outside into consideration without actually doing so.

Writing Under Erasure

There are several levels of paradox. The shallowest level, aleph-one, exists where words contradict themselves. One meaning is juxtaposed with a contradictory one. Such paradoxes can be articulated, such as in "This sentence is lying."
The deepest level, aleph-null, exists where language contradicts itself.
Here the possibility of meaning itself is cast into doubt. (This very formulation assumes that which it denies, for to speak of doubt is to assume that there is certainty.) Such paradoxes cannot be articulated, for a successful articulation would require the destruction of meaning itself. Derrida cannot of course articulate a paradox of type aleph-null, so he does the next best thing: he writes under erasure.

To write under erasure is to write a word and cross it out, but to let both the word and the deletion stand.

Derrida borrows this practice from its originator Heidegger, who critiques the word "Being" because simply to say the word presupposes that anything can be. This is precisely the pressuposition Heidegger wishes to examine, but it is very difficult to question the possibility of being in a language which exists because it assumes the possibility. Heidegger therefore writes the word as [.]. This allows him to point, metaphorically, to the fact that he cannot help but use the word in the very process of questioning its meaning.

Heidegger's use of the technique suggests that Being does exist and can somehow be apprehended through philosophy (the same hope articulated by Plato and, for that matter, by Hilbert, Norris and Whitehead.) Derrida assumes no such thing. He goes Heidegger one better, so to speak, by arguing that all language is written "under erasure." Language exists only because there is a paradox at the very place where language comes into being. In other words, there is an aleph-null paradox at the origin of language.

I suggest that the lethal text articulates an aleph-null paradox. Naturally, this text can only be written in a language which does not have the limitations of human language. Lethal texts have to be written in a transcendental language. Such languages cannot be translated into human ones, and those who read them cannot possibly convey what they have learned. Gayatri Spivak suggests that Heidegger "makes it clear that Being cannot be contained by, is always prior to, indeed transcends signification. It is therefore a situation where the signified commands, and yet is free of, all signifiers--a recognizably theological situation" (xvi). It is also a recognizably Platonic situation. To escape from the cave into the light is a metaphor for escaping into a world not bound by human language.

Macroscope suggests that its destroyer signal is simply a text which teaches its readers how to read the transcendental language in which it itself is written. It is a primer in transcendental language. Therefore, it is not what it says that is devastating, but rather how it says it. Its mere existence critiques human language and make the paradoxes that underlie it unbearable.

It is important that the destroyer signal is simply a text about itself, in such a way that to read it is to instantly experience what it describes. In describing transcendental language, it carries its readers into a transcendental realm. It is a text in which the USE-MENTION distinction, normally tanglable and tangled, becomes irrelevant. To mention it is to use it. The nam-shub described in Mesopotamian myth, and excavated in Snow Crash, is self-reflexive in exactly this way. It is a story about the destruction of language, which, when heard, destroys the language of its hearers.

"The Lethal Text"

Quite simply, the lethal text is a text that, when read, renders the reader incapable of reading. It destroys the reader's mind. It induces a crippling insanity. Only those who have read a lethal text know what it says...but they are in no position to share their knowledge.

What does the lethal text say? By definition, no one can know and remain capable of telling it. But perhaps it is a logical paradox.
The human mind has a kind of protective shield against paradoxes: it gets confused and gives up, instead of attempting to resolve them.
They can stop "running the program" set up by a paradox.
But the lethal text somehow penetrates this shield, presenting a paradox the mind cannot stop trying to resolve.

Which is why the lethal text is (probably) not possible: the mind is not a computer. The mind can deflect paradox by ceasing to think about it.

Derrida has probably come closer than anyone else to articulating a lethal text. His texts use language to describe language's limitations. A paradox!
But Derrida cannot truly complete the paradox; he can only point to it in a metaphorical way.

For example, he borrows Heidegger's technique of writing under erasure. But his texts can at best destroy themselves, whereas the lethal text destroys the reader.

Are readers' minds truly destroyed? Or are they elevated to a higher plane, like the escapees of Plato's cave, so that man's insanity is heaven's sense?

Lethal texts appear in a number of science-fiction novels. In Piers Anthony's Macroscope (1968), an alien message is picked up which destroys the mind of anyone intelligent enough to understand it. In Neal Stephenson's more recent Snow Crash (1994), the lethal text is transmitted via a computer virus, and is most threatening to hackers, whose neural pathways are most vulnerable to it. Pat Cadigan's Synners(1991) uses almost exactly the same plot device. It is also present in Arthur C. Clarke's short story The Ultimate Melody (1956) and The Mysterious Card. It appears in a somewhat different form in the Star Trek episode Is There No Truth in Beauty? (1968).

The lethal text appears, of course, in the Sirens' song of the Odyssey. It also plays a role in 2001: A Space Odyssey. In the Bible, God's face is treated as if it was a lethal text (Exodus 19:21 & 33:20.)

Models

A model is an intellectual structure which exists in a genotypal relationship to a referent. It abstracts the essential features of a referent. Thus a blueprint is a model, and the house built from it is its referent.

Baudrillard's simulacrum is of course a model without a referent: "a perfect copy of a nonexistent original." It is not really important whether a physical referent exists or not. It is not even important that it can exist. What's important is the existence of nonphysical structure.

The world of Plato's Ideal Forms is a such model. So is the world of Robinson Crusoe, which is an Enlightenment economy in miniature. So are the arks of Noah and Utnapishtim, and Gerlenter's Hospital.

Models are absolutely central to cyberspatial thought. Cyberspace itself is a model. Not necessarily or even importantly of particular real spaces, but of space itself: its boundedness, its volume, its up-down-left-right orientation, its passageways, and so on.

I would argue that a certain class of literary texts, including the ones just named above, are recognizably "cyberspatial" in that some of their fascination comes from their modelmaking. By this definition, the legend of Noah's Ark is "cyberspatial." I do not claim, of course, that the Bible anticipates cyberspace by 4700 years. Rather, I make the converse claim: cyberspace is the latest manifestation of a fascination with models which goes back 4700 years.

Karma and Linear Time

Karma is an aspect of the harmony in All-That-Is. Harmony is a popular description of constructive interference of all systems within the Whole. It is the only method of creation. As All-That-Is is a closed system we have conservation of energy – energy cannot be lost but only transformed from one form into another (1st law of thermodynamics). Hence in order to create something new one must destroy existing forms, release the energy stored in them and then use it for a new creation. The destruction of forms takes place according to the principle of destructive interference. Both

–  constructive interference and

–  destructive interference

is the only operative principle of creation and destruction in All-That-Is. The reason for that is that all its systems and levels are superimposed rotational systems that obey this principle. The latter is an aspect of the Universal Law and follow from the universal property of energy = space-time – the reciprocity of space and time. All-That-Is is an elastic entity and its two constituents, space and time, are canonically conjugated entities.

This is the mechanism of creation of waves and as all systems and levels of the Whole are wave systems, they follow the principle of constructive and destructive interference that is precisely described in the new wave theory of the Universal Law and is also properly acknowledged in conventional wave theory and physics. All 3D forms in the current reality can be considered standing waves created by the superposition of infinite underlying wave systems and corresponding levels that stand in constructive interference. When the parameters are slightly altered, this energetic state of balance, equilibrium and harmony, name it as you will, can suddenly turn into a state of destructive interference and the standing wave system dissipates. This is how 3D forms are created and destructed in any 3D holographic model. All-That-Is is constant creation and destruction as energy must flow in order to keep the systems alive. For instance, all cells of the human body are renewed approximately every seven years, some much more often.

While constructive and destructive interference occurs normally simultaneously and this is how all elementary particles are created and destroyed as wave systems in the physical 3D universe, this principle has been modified in the current 3D holographic model of human incarnation with respect to karma. The two aspects of being are separated for the sake of preserving the stability of this illusory reality.

This is done in the first place by the creation of the illusion of linear time which is a product of limited human senses. In fact linear time does not exist but is an aspect of space (distance), which is another illusion. Actually both space (distance) and linear (conventional) time are one and the same and are only perceived as distinct entities by limited human senses. This has been extensively elaborated in the new Gnosis avaliable.

The creation of illusory space and time in the current holographic model is the foundation of matter that appears as solid, immovable entity. Matter, the way it is currently perceived by humans, is entirely an illusion of limited human senses, and this includes its manipulation with all kinds of instruments in the form of new technologies. This deliberate deception created by the incarnated souls is indispensable for the preservation of the illusion of space-time in this 3D holographic reality.

In the greater reality of All-That-Is all forms of matter are in a state of constant fluctuations and energy exchange. I can see for instance these fluctuations and moving geometric patterns based on peaks and troughs of constructive and destructive interference all the time for roughly 10 years since I entered the LBP(Light Body Process) and my third eye began to open. This is true for all ascended masters currently still in human body on this planet as many members of the PAT(Planetary Ascension Team).

Human vision has the inner propensity to “iron” these fluctuations and to present them to the human brain and mind as stable, immovable objects with fixed surface and form. This illusion is the actual creation of 3D space-time as a holographic image, which is an U-subset of All-That-Is as it is embedded in the higher dimensions and energies of the multiverse that create it and keep it alive. This explains the numerous channellings that say that the higher realms are within us and we need not actually ascend anywhere but only raise sufficiently our frequencies to reach 5D and higher dimensions.

While this is true, we still need to undergo a phase transition that will transform the limited, slow operating carbon-based human brain and mind into a superconductive crystalline-light brain aligned to a multidimensional awareness. This is the prerequisite of true ascension from a physical point of view and all other esoteric descriptions are more or less human fictions because excarnated sources can only channel what is already in the mind of the human channeller and, as we all know, most New Agers do not have much knowledge in their heads, unfortunately…

So far I have not said anything which I have not iterated in infinite variations in my previous articles but it is important to sum up these basic truths here one more time so that you can follow my subsequent argumentation.

In order to keep the illusion of space-time as an entity composed of solid, material forms, including the human physical bodies, even though the latter undergo a biological transformation within one life while seemingly preserving the individual identity, the energetic state of constructive and destructive interference must be neatly separated within one incarnation. Otherwise the incarnated personality may easily discern the deliberate fraud behind this artificial construction and realize that she is an immortal multidimensional entity that exists simultaneously in different incarnations in different worlds and holographic realities, such as alternative parallel earths and the uniqueness of this incarnation experiment would be lost. All the dramas that can be staged only when the human awareness is limited by an almost total separation from the multidimensional omniscience of the soul would not be possible.

That is why the incarnated personality may appear in one incarnation as perpetrator and villain and commit crimes in service-to-self and then in the next incarnation balance this karmic debt by being a victim or having some negative experiences as a compensation for previous crimes. This was the rule of the game as long as the illusion of separation from the source was total and even for enlightened people, such as most New Agers, the human incarnation cycle appeared to be a chronological event of past, present and future lives. In this way the incarnation experiment on earth could be repeated each time in a state of total amnesia about the original higher dimensional realms of the soul in infinite variations again and again.

As all variations were exhausted on earth in the meantime, which means the entire spectrum of all possible negative human experiences was repeated infinite times and nothing new could be learnt by the incarnated fragments anymore, our souls decided to leave this unyielding 3D holographic model and enter again the 5th and higher dimensions of unity and simultaneity, that is to say, to come back home, from where most of the soul fragments incarnate on this planet. This is the eschatological background of the current ascension process for which the PAT is mainly responsible.

A major aspect of the ascension process is the acceleration of time until its total elimination in the moment of the final ID shift (phase transition) into the simultaneity of 5D. This acceleration is an aspect of the significant and constant increase in frequencies of all 3D forms, such as human and animal bodies, inanimate matter, and Gaia as a whole that began with the first harmonic convergence in 1987 which many of us personally felt. It was a call to come back home and our hearts began to beat with joy. Little did we know at that time about the daily crucifixions that were awaiting us in the following time. We must work to make this common knowledge.

The contraction of linear time is a central piece in the theory of relativity as first developed by Lorentz and other physicists in electromagnetism and only then plagiarized by Einstein and applied to the entire space-time of the visible universe. As linear time is identical to space (distance), when the reciprocal constituent of space-time, time = frequency (see for definition of time in the new physical and mathematical axiomatics of the Universal Law) increases in the process of ascension, both space and linear (conventional) time must contract until the zero point is reached. This term is very popular among esotericists although they have no clue what it means from a physical point of view. Actually there is no such thing as zero point as when linear time contracts to a minimal threshold level a phase transition of this holographic model takes place and we have the ID shift, about which I am beginning to writing repeatedly. This is what we are waiting for and this is what will happen this year, hopefully very soon.

The contraction of linear time leads to introduction of immediate karma.

Although this term has also been extensively discussed by us on this website I have never put it properly in its physical context. Immediate karma means that the two dialectical states of constructive and destructive interference are not separated for the sake of preserving the illusion of this 3D holographic reality as ascension is per definition the elimination of this illusion. In the current end phase of ascension both states exist simultaneously in the Now and any situation can immediately flip-flop from constructive into destructive interference and affect its creator and perpetrator. This is how this old 3D matrix with all its manifestations and institutions at the societal levels is now being dissolved with exponentially increasing speed. Please observe that speed is a quantity of space and time and when the two contract, that is to say when the frequencies increase, the speed also increases in a relativistic manner. This observation is another ubiquitous proof for the validity of the new theory of the Universal Law.

Since spring equinox we have entered the final most accelerated phase of creation and destruction in the ascension process when the matrix will be dissolved within a few days and at the same time the new reality of the 5D in form of cities of light will manifest.

Therefore I can only advise my readers to focus on the creative aspects during this last phase in the ascension process and when observing the collapse of the old matrix with all its despicable and dreadful events to do this in a dispassionate manner and only with the goal of gauging the speed of transformation. As we are the creators of this change, the quicker we destroy this old reality with our thoughts, the quicker we create the new 5D and higher dimensional reality and manifest it in this rapidly changing holographic model. This may sound very abstract but it has some very real and practical consequences.

Let us discuss them on the aforementioned energetic background as the energetic dynamics behind the ascension process is currently as abstract and elusive to most human minds as simple as it is in terms of true axiomatics (logic) which humanity has still to learn. Here I will discuss the manifestation of immediate karma and how it occurs at the societal level, in politics, economics and social life.

Essentially we have two factions of humanity that are now being energetically separated and highly polarised (crystalized) in service-to-self and service-to-other people in preparation for the final ID shift. The first group are the so-called dark ones who will not ascend and will not actively participate in all the impending changes before, during and after the ID shift. They will continue with their incarnation cycle on a lower 3D or 4D timeline after they have ended this incarnation with a physical death. This automatically presupposes that many people will have to die in the coming events that will lead to the ID shift and final ascension of Gaia and part of humanity.

This must be said crystal-clear and likewise understood by all those who will be the spearhead of ascension as they are the only representatives of humanity that undergo this process in a conscious manner. Needless to say that I am speaking here in the first place of the PAT and the waves of ascended masters. Therefore you must respond in a very detached and enlightened manner when the negative events begin to stipulate on this uppermost mother planet in the coming days.

These events will be triggered entirely by the service-to-self people that work in state institutions and big corporations as they still have the power to manipulate this reality. Or so they believe at least. As we now have immediate karma, none of these events will harm or even touch the service-to-other people that have made up their mind to leave this reality and ascend. Instead every heinous act the dark ones will unleash will immediately backlash and will hit the perpetrators. In other words no matter what they do, it will be to their immediate detriment.